The "Generic, Old-Fashioned Broadcast Network From The 1970s (Peacock-Streaming)", Has Had Its "October Schedule" Posted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.peacocktv.com/blog/what-to-watch-new-on-peacock%3famp

"So Say We All!!"

If You Want FAILURE, No Media Corporation on Earth Has More of an "Endless History" of It Than "Comcast / NBC-Universal"

 

"So Say We All!!"

More "Failure Fluff" From The "Failure Past" of NBC-TV

 

"B.J. and The Bear"

I think the dude is hairier than the monkey.

"So Say We All!!"

Yes, The "Endless Sea" of Everything Not Being Watched on "Peacock-Streaming" and Never Will Be Watched by Everyone

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/11-underrated-shows-you-didn-t-know-are-streaming-on-peacock/ss-AA1rQPtC

"So Say We All!!"

How About This One, "Comcast / NBC-Universal?"

 

"So Say We All!!"

Is "Comcast / NBC-Universal" Longing For The Simpler Days of "Supertrain" Yet? When Its Failures Were Bigger Yet Less Frequent

 

"So Say We All!!"

If Your "Horror Production" Is Titled Nothing More Than "Teacup", Will Any "Horror Audience" Even Bother With You?

 

"So Say We All!!"

Only at "Peacock-Streaming:" Horror Programming Making an Attempt at Having a Social Conscience??

 

https://www.usanetwork.com/usa-insider/hysteria-everything-to-know-about-peacock-satanic-panic-series

"So Say We All!!"

Many Things In Life Fall Into This Definition....

 Definition: "Well, it's there, and doesn't make any sort of an impact one way or the other...."

One critic of both leaning more one way than the other.

"So Say We All!!"

"Peacock-Streaming" Continuing The "Corporate Tradition" of The "SyFy Channel" of Always Being The "It's So Obvious It Hurts Entity" of Never "Fitting In" Anywhere in The "Business World" of "Hollywood"

 

"So Say We All!!"

It's The Start of a New Week With "Peacock-Streaming" Still Only Having 30 Million Subscribers after FIVE YEARS of Operation

 

"So Say We All!!"

This Is What "Peacock-Streaming" Announces to The "Streaming Industry" Everyday

 

Peacock-Streaming: "Since we don't know how to run a streaming service, we're just going to run it as an old fashioned, 'General Interest Broadcast Network' from decades ago, instead. Whatever you're in the mood for, we got it."

"So Say We All!!"

The Highest Number of Votes Was 696. Was it Necessary to Even Bother?

 

https://www.ranker.com/list/best-current-syfy-shows/ranker-tv

"So Say We All!!"

"Peacock" Is an "Ambiguous Title" For a "Streaming Service" In The First Place

 

And then they have "Original Productions" with "Generic Titles" that just don't grab you with "Ambiguous Subject Matter" no one is familiar with.

With a title like "Teacup", what sort of an audience are they going after?

Certainly not a "Mass Market Audience."

Perhaps a razor thin Ronald D. Moore "Artsy-esque" audience?

You don't build a "Monster-sized Subscriber Base" (in the hundreds of millions) thinking along such finite lines.

And then they never advertise their "Original Productions" well at all.

What is the above trailer about?

What sort of  "Financial Metrics" are coming into play here with successive and astonishing (in a very bad way) business decisions like this?

"So Say We All!!"