If a New "Firefly" Movie or "Streaming Series" Is About to Be Made, The "Copyright Owners" Only Have to Remember This One Thing....

 

Don't hire any of these people for any reason, in any capacity, and the movie / streaming series will then get made within a reasonable amount of time....

1. Sam Esmail

2. Simon Kinberg

3. Frances Lawrence

4. Dylan Clark

5. Michael DeLuca

6. Scott Stuber

7. Michael Lesslie

8. Derek Simonds

9. Jack Paglen

10. Lisa Joy

11. John Orloff

12. Bryan Singer

13. Tom SeSanto

14. Dan Angel

15. Billie Brown

A...."Collective Failure"....to bring back...."Battlestar Galactica"....in any way for...."26 Consecutive Years".... (2000-2026).

No small feat!!

'So Say We All!!"

Notice How Badly "Universal Studios Mismanagement Reputation" Has Always Been With The "Battlestar Galactica" Property....

When The likelihood of...."Firefly"....returning is made known, the question IS NOT....

...."Will Universal Studios bring back Battlestar Galactica as well?"....

But rather....

...."Will Universal Studios re-start its...'Fake Battlestar Galactica Press Releases'....in response, instead?"....

"So Say We All!!"

Don't Let "Universal Studios Executives" See This!! It Would Inspire Them to "Re-Start" Their "Fake Battlestar Galactica Press Releases" With Sam Esmail and Simon Kinberg!!

 

"So Say We All!!"

https://screenrant.com/firefly-cast-nathan-fillion-reboot-speculation-announcement-tease/

Is "Peacock-Streaming" Still Having Its "Astonishing Fantasies" of Being The "#1 Sports Stop For Everyone" Because It Doesn't Own Anything of The Magnitude of "Star Trek" and "Indiana Jones" to Make Into a "Streaming Series?"

 

"So Say We All!!"

If "Peacock-Streaming" Had Never "Officially" Pulled The Plug on "Battlestar" After Doing Nothing With It For 5 Years, It Would Still Be In "Limbo" For 5 Years and Counting Still Due to Parent Corporation "Comcast / NBC-Universal" Still Not Doing Anything With It

 

....With Sam Esmail still giving his vague and non-existent updates every 14 months....after 5/6 years.

"So Say We All!!"

"SyFy Channel" Still Has That "Annoying Habit" of "Just Sticking Around" Decade After Decade, Even After Never Doing Anything Particularly Well

 

https://darkskiesfilm.com/what-happened-to-sci-fi-channel/

Yes, and...."Peacock-Streaming"....is already locked into the same fate.

"So Say We All!!"

"Comcast / NBC-Universal" Seems to Have More "Flop Material" to Choose From Than "Hits", When It Comes to Making a "Streaming Series" For "Peacock."

 

1. Tales From The Crypt: Demon Knight

2. R.I.P.D. 

3. 12 Monkeys

4. Josie & The Pussycats

5. Helix

6. Cocaine Bear

7. Last Voyage of The Demeter

8. Abigail

9. Wolf Man

10. Werewolves

"So Say We All!!"

It's Always That Which Would Deliver The Most Success to "Peacock-Streaming", Is Always Reduced to a "Flickering Candle", and Then The Candle Goes Out (For Good)

 

"So Say We All!!"

With "Peacock-Streaming" and "Comcast / NBC-Universal" Overall, It Always Comes Down to a 'One-Time Moment" That Temporarily Saves Them From ""Themselves"

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/winter-olympics-close-with-nearly-double-the-viewers-from-2022/ar-AA1WVLeg?ocid=BingNewsSerp

An...."Olympics Broadcast".... here, a...."Steven Spielberg Movie"....there.

After that, it's always back to the usual...."Abysmal Financial Diasappointments"....for them.

"So Say We All!!"

If "Peacock-Streaming" Were Smart, It Would Use Its "The Burbs" Series to Compete With The Upcoming "Scooby Doo Live Action Series" on "Netflix"

 

....And if it got good numbers, for once...."Peacock-Streaming"....could finally feel like it was a part of the...."Streaming Industry".....(after 6 years)....

"So Say We All!!"

If "The Burbs" Isn't Renewed For a Second Season, Could There Be Another Year Before "Peacock" Tries Another "Fantasy / Science Fiction" Series?

 

"So Say We All!!"

The Inevitable Question: The 8 Episodes of "The Burbs" Have Been Burned Off. What Now?

 

More bolder excursions into experimental programming for "Peacock?"

"So Say We All!!"

If There Had Been a "Battlestar" Production Recently Announced, "Universal Studios" Would Be Using This "WGA Strike" For Excuses Left and Right, as to Why The "Battlestar" Production Was Not Moving Forward

 

https://variety.com/2026/film/news/wga-staff-strike-weeks-ahead-amptp-negotiations-1236665769/

"So Say We All!!"

You Can't Make "Bad News / Good", No Matter How Hard You Try

 

 

"So Say We All!!"

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/comcast-q2-2025-earnings-peacock-subscribers-versant-news-1236334135/

Ultimately, What Will Always Hover Over "Peacock-Streaming" (Like Dark Clouds) as a "Failed Streaming Service", Is Its Failure to Revitalize "Battlestar Galactica", Which in Turn Could Have Revitalized Them

 

"So Say We All!!"

Maybe If "Peacock-Streaming" Went Backwards, and Tried to Explain (Using Its Hands), What It's Overall Identity Is, Using One of Its Specific Series As a "Starting Point"

 

"So Say We All!!"

Remembering When The "SyFy Channel's" Early Days (The 2000s), "Torpedoed" Permanently, Any Chance It May Have Had With The "Science Fiction / Comic- Con Fan Community"

 

"So Say We All!!"

Have The "SyFy Channel's" Old Movies (2010), Begun Getting Ridiculed by Reputable Sources?

 

"So Say We All!!"

Would It Be Worth a "Go" on "Peacock-Streaming?" An "8-Episode Series?"

 

"So Say We All!!'

The Argument From "Media Historians" Will Always Be: "Peacock-Streaming" Simply Didn't Own Anything of The "Noteworthy Magnitude" That Other "Streaming Entities" Did, Such as "Disney +"

 

https://collider.com/the-burbs-review-peacock-reboot-keke-palmer/

"So Say We All!!'

What Will Be Discussed By "Media Historians" Decades From Now In "College Lecture Halls?"

 

Why there were so many endless...."Errors in Judgment"....while managing...."Peacock-Streaming"....

"So Say We All!!" 

Once Again, The Fun Isn't Anywhere Near "Peacock-Streaming"

 

In this case, the fun is at....'Disney +"....and...."ABC"....

"So Say We All!!"

What Is The "Central Identifying Marker" For "Peacock-Streaming?" The "Main Thing" It Is Known For in "Pop Culture?"

 Such as these....

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/new-on-peacock-full-list-of-movies-shows-streaming-in-february-2026/ar-AA1VoVpe?ocid=BingNewsSerp

"So Say We All!!"

When a "Nameless / Faceless" Streaming Service Has "Nameless / Faceless" (Unrecognizable) Programming

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/new-on-peacock-full-list-of-movies-shows-streaming-in-february-2026/ar-AA1VoVpe?ocid=BingNewsSerp

"So Say We All!!'

"Peacock-Streaming" and "SyFy" Will Continue Existing In a "Hazy Fog" Being Unknown to The Vast Majority of The Population

 

"So Say We All!!"

It Has Been Quite Simply, That "Peacock-Streaming" Simply Doesn't Own Anything of a "Fun Nature" to Make Into a "Streaming Series"

 

"So Say We All!!"

Is "Peacock-Streaming" Now Going In The Direction of Sibling "SyFy" With Low Budget Horror Movies?

 

Is this new...."SyFy Channel Direction"....the...."Back-Up Plan"....of...."Peacock"....in the event...."Sports Streaming"....does not work out for them?

"So Say We All!!"

Both "Failed Entities" Will Go Down In History as "Not Being What They Were Supposed to Be"

 

Not a "Streaming Service"

Not a "Science Fiction Channel"

"So Say We All"

It Must Be a Really Long Time For The Next "Steven Spielberg Box Office Rescue"

 

Right?

"So Say We All!!"

"Comcast - NBC-Universal's"...."Corporate Strategies"....For "Founding" The...."Peacock-Streaming"....Entity

 

1. Have absolutely...."Zero Knowledge"....of the...."Streaming Industry"....in terms of its trends (Science Fiction / Fantasy Programming), and what doesn't make money.

2. Did absolutely...."Zero Research"....into what would make...."Peacock"....profitable and what would not. And, did...."Zero Research"....into what the...."Streaming Industry"....is overall. Such research could have prepared...."Peacock"....for what it would be dealing with on a daily basis in the...."Streaming Industry."....It was NOT PREPARED for what it would be facing instead.

3. Pretty much, just run...."Peacock"....the way...."SyFy"....has always been run: haphazard and unrelated movies and TV shows thrown up on the screen.

4. Always do the exact opposite of what the entire...."Streaming Industry"....has been doing: providing robustly funded...."Science Fiction / Fantasy / Horror"....programming.

5. Completely overlook the...."Blunt Reality"....in the...."Streaming Industry"....that you need an instantly identifiable...."Identity Marker"....to draw subscribers to you in the hundreds of millions the way ALL of the other...."Streaming Services".... have succeeded at...."Mickey Mouse"...."Star Wars"...."Indiana Jones"...."Star Trek"....etc.

6. Completely SCREW-UP and procrastinate with (five years and counting) the one property it would have had to draw subscribers to it in the hundreds of millions...."Battlestar Galactica"....that would have instantly given it a badly needed...."Identity Marker"....from day one.

7. Instead...."F*cking Around"....in an area of expertise (Sports Programming), it has absolutely...."Zero Sports Knowledge"....of, and...."Zero Technical Knowledge"....of, to even successfully pull-off a...."Live Sports Broadcast"....of ANYTHING.

8. "Peacock Streaming"....needs to leave...."Sports Programming"....to the PROFESSIONALS who know how to do it, like...."ESPN"....Because...."Peacock"....has always SUCKED ASS at trying to do it....itself.

9. "UNDER-FUND"...."Peacock"....across the board from day one...."Peacock"....has always been the...."Low Budget Embarrassment"....the...."Legitimate Streaming Industry"....NEVER talks about.

10. Because of this and ENDLESS other reasons, the REAL TALENTS in entertainment....Steven Spielberg and Tim Burton, never bother with...."Peacock"....

"So Say We All!!"

"Peacock" Was "Hardwired" From Its Inception to Not Know What It Is and Thus, to Fail

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/tv/nbc-is-axing-scripted-content-but-what-does-that-say-about-peacock/ar-AA1EzlrW

1. 5-6 years later, it still can't define itself. Sports? Dramas? Sitcoms?

2. You read multiple, different articles on "Peacock", and you read multiple, different attemps at trying to define "Peacock." (Still, 5-6 years later.) All attempts incorrect.

3. Even when the authors of these articles attempt to contact "Peacock", for a definition of "what it is", even the "Peacock" bosses don't know (5-6 years later) what the hell it is.

4. The only accurate definition of what "Peacock" is...."A miserable failure at being a streaming service, and failing to get above 42 million subscribers after 5-6 years, regardless of whether or not it focuses on Sports, Sitcoms, or scripted Dramas."

5. So now "Peacock" is in a permanent "Rut", endlessly sitting side by side with that other 'Definition Failure'....'SyFy'...."

"So Say We All!!"

"Peacock" Can't Decide If It Wants to Be a "Sports Network" or a Provider of "Sitcoms" and "Scripted Dramas"

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/tv/nbc-is-axing-scripted-content-but-what-does-that-say-about-peacock/ar-AA1EzlrW

So, it always has its left and right feet in two different swimming pools....

"So Say We All!!"

What Could Always Save "Peacock" or "NBC" In The Long Run, Never Sees The "Light of Day" or Is Cancelled Prematurely

 

"So Say We All!!"