Is It Really a Bad Thing For an Actor or Actress to Be Rejected by The Producers of "Sharknado" For its Thoroughly Unnecessary Sequel?

http://www.tmz.com/2013/07/28/sharknado-sequel-tara-reid-rejected/

I submit that this is the last thing in life that Tara Reid should give a second thought about. I also submit that it can only be good thing (a blessing) for any actor or actress to be rejected by the producers of "Sharknado" for sequel appearances. An actor or actress can only move on to bigger and better things and since we're talking about  rejection from a "Low Budget, B-Grade Schlock Horror Movie Sequel" on the SyFy Channel, anything in life would be better than this, even if Tara Reid were to sit at home and read a book. That would still be better than appearing in the "Sharknado" sequel.

Professionally speaking...being rejected by the producers of "Sharknado" for an appearance in its sequel I equate with being fired from a job as the "Tilt-a-Whirl Operator" at your local carnival and county fair. The person who pushes and pulls the great big lever that makes the "Tilt-a-Whirl" start and stop.

This is precisely what Tara Reid has gone through. No biggy.

________________________________________


Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264