At Various Locations, Pictures of "Comcast / NBC-Universal's" Subsidiaries Have Begun Showing Up Underneath The Definition of "Boring"

 

After 22 Consecutive Years (2001-2023), "Universal Studios" Still Hasn't Learned That If It Wants a "Battlestar Galactica" Movie, It Actually Has to Make One, Instead of Issuing "Fake Battlestar Press Releases."

 

Who runs "Universal Studios?" Toddlers?

70% Off a Full Year of "Peacock-Streaming?" Will This Get It Above 20 Million Subscribers After Three Years?

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/peacock-s-summer-deal-lets-you-save-while-you-stream-vanderpump-rules-yellowstone-and-more/ar-AA1bEO6H

Umm, No.

Perhaps "Universal Studios" Should Begin Hiring People Who Have The Ability to Develop Movie Ideas That Are The Slightest Bit Interesting

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Universal_Pictures_films_(2020%E2%80%932029)

This shit? Forget it.

No "Battlestar" Movie up through 2029? No surprise there.

We Have Seen The Intellectual Heights "Universal Studios" Always Reaches, and It's Never a Pretty Sight

 

Reverse progress on the "Intellectual Evolutionary Scale" is nothing new to "Universal Studios."

Tom DeSanto Proposed an Animated "Galactica" Film Like This to "Universal Studios" Decades Ago (2001)

 

"Universal Studios" (of course) rejected the idea because it preferred instead, to spend the next two decades issuing "Fake Battlestar Galactica Movie / TV Show Press Releases."

Yes, intellectually and logistically, "Universal Studios" couldn't even handle making a frickin' "Battlestar Cartoon"....

How Many More Corporations is "Peacock-Streaming" Going to Become a Subsidiary of?

 

Just wondering.

If Everything is Just "Peachy" Between "Peacock-Streaming" and The "Premier League"', Why Does "Peacock-Streaming" Remain Stuck at Only 20 Million Subscribers After Five Years?

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/peacock-scores-most-streamed-premier-league-game-of-all-time/ar-AA1fjw2z

"Comcast / NBC-Universal" and its "Goofy Ass Subsidiary Peacock-Streaming" remain a true anomaly in the entire "Hollywood Business World." The strange shit that always happens to them (ongoing) always has to be seen to be believed.   

The Alleged "Custodian" of an Alleged "Battlestar" Movie Allegedly in Production For Almost a Quarter Century

 

          Dylan Clark: Battlestar 2001-2023

https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/battlestar-galactica-new-movie-tv-shared-universe/

Does that justify paychecks paid to someone for allegedly overseeing an alleged "Battlestar" Movie (that never gets made) allegedly in production for almost a quarter century?

Hint: The movie continues not getting made on purpose.

After Not Making a "Battlestar Galactica" Movie in 22 Consecutive Years, "Universal Studios" Tried to Pass off Such an Eccentricity as "Psychologically Normal Behavior"

 

https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/battlestar-galactica-movie-updates-release-date-development-hell-streaming

It failed to do so.

22 years = Almost a quarter century.

The Other Studios Can Always Be Infinitely More Fun Than "Universal Studios" Without Even Trying

Yes, "Universal Studios" never would have greenlit this for production. It's just too much fun.

It goes against their "Corporate Policy" that anyone would enjoy anything they make.

Do The Employees Working at "Peacock-Streaming" Get "Medical, Dental, and Paid Vacation Benefits" From Their Real "Corporate Bosses" at "JetBlue Airlines" and "Hallmark Channel?"

 

Just wondering.

"Peacock-Streaming" Continues Doing Its Impression of The "Seinfeld" Show. A Streaming Service About Nothing In Particular

 

No central identity, no dynamic copyright properties to exploit, never any inspired trajectory for improving itself. Nothing. Period.

As of Last Month, "Peacock-Streaming's" Subscriber Numbers Are Still Extremely Low. As In, Never Budging an Inch Above 20 Million

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1246902/number-sign-ups-peacock-united-states/

As is always the case with "Peacock-Streaming", nothing to see here...move on, move on.

Why does parent corporation "Comcast / NBC-Universal" even bother? Why does it even bother after having never invested in it properly in the first place? 

Yes, "Google" or "Bing" Sam Esmail and Simon Kinberg Lately, and You Get Some of Their Almost a Decade Old, "Fake Battlestar Press Release" Nonsense

And what is pretty much left of their failed careers:

Traces of their failed projects that would fill a messy broom closet....

"New Line Cinema" and "Lionsgate" are always accurate in their assessments of these two guys.

"Marvel Studios" Routinely Does "Box Office" Like This With The Release of Just One of Its "Superhero" Movies

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/oppenheimer-box-office-breaks-into-top-10-highest-grossing-r-rated-movies-list/ar-AA1f6fbJ

So, what's the fuss? What's the big deal?

Is "Peacock-Streaming" Still a Subsidiary of The "Hallmark Channel" and "Jet-Blu Airlines?"

 

Just wondering.

How Much Time and Effort Did "Comcast / NBC-Universal" Actually Put Into The Production of This "Direct-to-DVD" Movie?

 

This Blog estimates it took about 8 days to make this entire movie from inception to DVD release, with its overall budget equaling the "Catering Budget" of  most moderately budgeted "Hollywood" movies....

Checking In on "Universal Studios" 23 Year Old (Allegedly in Production All of That Time) "Battlestar" Movie

 

Does Simon Kinberg have jumper cables until the next time it stalls?

"Retro-Flasback Fun Day!!" Remembering When Ronald D. Moore's "GINO" - (Galactica in Name Only) Series Celebrated "Frowning" and "Manic-Depression"

 

Reliable sources indicate that some individuals watching this series called the "Suicide Hotline" frequently.

Go ahead. Take a "whiff."

"Universal Studios" Didn't Even Have Enough "Guts" to Revisit Ronald D. Moore's "GINO" - (Galactica in Name Only) Series In a Theatrical Film

 

If this dysfunctional series was so wildly successful as the "SyFy Channel" has repeatedly claimed, why didn't "Universal Studios" ever commission Simon Kinberg and Sam Esmail to make a "movie / streaming series" to capitalize on its supposed success?

Zero faith in any such project, no doubt.

How Is "Comcast / NBC-Universal" Handling The Supremacy of "Marvel Studios" Over Them in "Hollywood?"

 

Quite well, I suppose.