"Comcast / NBC-Universal" Has No Clue What The Hell "Battlestar Galactica" Is, Has No Clue What The Hell to Do With It, and Has No Clue How to Make Noteworthy MONEY With It

 

After 5 decades and still counting (1978-2024).

"So Say We All!!"

Articles Are Now Being Written About Sam Esmail's (Still Alleged After 5 Years) "Battlestar" Production, Illustrating How ZERO ACTIVITY is Still The "Modus Operandi" of The "Still Alleged" (After 5 Years) Production

 

"Yes, let's write the umpteenth article about Sam Esmail still not lifting a finger to make his ALLEGED "Battlestar" production after 5 years."

"But, we'll try and phrase the article in such a way where the false impression is created where it seems like Sam Esmail might be doing something (after 5 years.)"

https://collider.com/battlestar-galactica-reboot-sam-esmail/

"So Say We All!!"

Why The "Battlestar" Spin-Offs Failed

 

Why the "Battlestar" spin-offs failed?

1. Mis-using the "Battlestar" brand name (in the first place) for Ronald D. Moore's personal projects which were clearly, lazy "Rick Berman Era Star Trek Sequel Series" Instead.

2. Not canceling Ronald D. Moore's embarrassing ratings abomination (low ratings) in the first place that led to the God awful "Caprica" and "Blood & Chrome."

3. Lacking the conviction and common sense to NOT "Green-Light" all of these laughable and clearly not workable projects in the first place.

4. Lacking the conviction and common sense to realize that EVERYONE (from producers on down to catering) were in way over their heads (intellectually) trying to tackle any project mis-using the "Battlestar" brand name for other STUPID IDEAS instead. Stupid ideas having nothing to do with "Battlestar."

5. Ronald D. Moore was hardly well thought of within the realms of any "Star Trek" fan circle at the time (2003) he was given his own series with "Battlestar" in the title.

That was a disaster waiting to happen and sure enough, that was precisely what it turned out to be.

6. Moore knew nothing about what "Battlestar" really was at the time and naively, proceeded along as if he was merely working on yet another "Rick Berman Era Star Trek Sequel Series."

He even added the God awful "Techno-Babble" to scripts to make himself feel right at home.

"So Say We All!!"

Even if Sam Esmail and "Peacock-Streaming" Did Produce a Giant Turd With The "Battlestar" Name Attached to It, It Would Just Be Added to an Ever Growing Line of Recently FAILED Fantasy Productions of "Comcast / NBC-Universal"

 

And of course, the entire "SyFy Channel" schedule....

"So Say We All!!"

Katee Sackhoff Might be Allegedly Returning to Sam Esmail's Alleged "Battlestar" Production?

 

https://screenrant.com/battlestar-galactic-reboot-release-date-story-updates/

This is about as exciting as suddenly finding out that the rerun of the "Three Stooges" you're watching has "Shemp" in it instead of "Curly."

And that goes for the remainder of the alleged news in the same article.

"So Say We All!!"

The "Long Lost Idiots" Who at One Time Were Also Associated With a ""Battlestar" Production

 

All vanished in the "Bermuda Triangle"....

1. Dan Angel

2. Billy Brown

3. Jack Paglen

4. Lisa Joy

"So Say We All!!"

Investor Repellents (Driving Investors Away)

 

If I were an investor with millions of dollars, I wouldn't touch any "Battlestar" production with a "Ten Foot Cattle Prod" if any of these idiots (repellents) were attached to the production....

1. Sam Esmail

2. Simon Kinberg

3. Dylan Clark

4. Frances Lawrence

5. Michael DeLuca

6. Scott Stuber

7. Michael Lesslie

8. Derek Simonds

8. Bryan Singer

9. Tom DeSanto

10. John Orloff

"So Say We All!!"