Here's Some Really "Blunt News" For "Peacock:" Even If You Narrow Your Losses Down to $215 Million, You're STILL Doing Really, Really BADLY. This is still, Really, Really BAD NEWS.

 

https://www.degonline.org/peacock-narrows-loss-to-215m-subscribers-jump-to-41m/

Even if you're gaining subscribers while profits drop by $400 million, where is the "Good News" in that?

"Peacock"....has got to be the most....Oddball....Goofy....Weird....Cluster *ucking....Eternally Failing....Mathematically Lopsided...."Streaming Service"....in history.

And it has had the exact, same "Business Problems" for half a decade.

Where did "Peacock's Business People" attend college?

1. Everest College?

2. ITT Technical College?

3. University of Phoenix?

4. Vatterott College?

5. American Intercontinental University?

As much as "Peacock" would love to differ, there is no "Hidden Rainbow" in the existence of "Peacock-Streaming." 

There never has been.

There is also no "Hidden Rainbow" in a $400 million loss.

How could there be?

"So Say We All!!"