Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Is Glen A. Larson Still With Us To Develop a "Battlestar Galactica" Movie After 36 Years?

 

http://www.vulture.com/2014/04/battlestar-galactica-movie-in-development.html

I hope so!!


_______________________________________

 Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264

Monday, June 16, 2014

I Have Seen The Future of "Battlestar Galactica", And it May No Longer Be In The Dormant Hands of Universal Studios and Glen A. Larson


Will a "Battlestar Galactica Fan Revolt" finally whisk "Battlestar Galactica 1978" out from under the 36 year long dormant feet of Universal Studios and Glen A. Larson....and begin creating outstanding and accurate fan films like this one?

Not for profit of course....(Evil Grin)....But then again....


_______________________________________

 Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264

My Question Is, How Much Longer is Universal Studios Going to keep Up The "Con Game" of Its "Fake Battlestar Movie Press Releases?"


April 8, 2014 - "Ho hum." The usual nonsense from Universal Studios and its "Fake Battlestar Galactica Movie Press Releases." The movie they never have any real intention of making yet keep re-announcing this "Fake Press Release" every two years. Since 2001 these "Fake Announcements" have been re-occurring.


August 3rd, 2012 - Bryan Singer weighs in on the "Battlestar Galactica" movie he never had any real intention of making


October 21st, 2011 - Whatever did happen to John Orloff? Universal Studios caught again lying about a "Battlestar" movie they never had any real intention of making.


_______________________________________

 Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264

Why is Universal Studios Always The Most Unsuccessful Movie Studio of All Time When it Comes to Science Fiction?



Because all of the great classic stuff they own Science Fiction related is always and endlessly tied up in lawsuits spanning decades....

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/knight-rider-producer-glen-larson-lawsuit-universal-356300

...Great classic stuff that is always full throttle franchise potential material if Universal Studios weren't always such a "Shitty Manager" towards all of this great classic material.

Now, the above article is two years old. So,that's another two years Universal Studios has blown at not making money with all of this great classic stuff if it were simply managed properly by the idiots at Universal Studios.

Has Universal Studios ever realized what a truly...."Retarded"...and...."Down's Syndrome".....studio it has been towards all things Science Fiction (especially "Battlestar Galactica") for the past 36 years?

All of this in addition to the fact that Universal Studios can't do any new stuff Science Fiction related with any degree of competency either ("Cowboys & Aliens", "R.I.P.D.")

_______________________________________

 Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264



Friday, June 13, 2014

Why Are The People That Universal Studios Mentions In Its Ongoing Series of "Fake Battlestar Galactica Movie Press Releases" Never Seen Or Heard From Ever Again?



...In addition to the "Fake Battlestar Movies" always mentioned in these "Fake Press Releases"....

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/04/08/battlestar-galactica-movie-moves-forward

Jack Paglen?
Scott Bernstein?
Jay Polidoro?
John Orloff?

Who are these people?

Two months after these people were mentioned in the "Fake Battlestar Galactica Movie Press Release" linked above....It is already shaping up for them to not be seen or heard from ever again...if they ever existed at all.

What does Universal Studios do with these people after they are mentioned and never heard from again in these fake press releases? These same people that never even had an "IMDB" page. These same people that Hollywood never has heard of before. These same people that apparently didn't even have a career in Hollywood prior to being mentioned in these "Fake Battlestar Galactica Movie Press Releases."

I suspect that Universal Studios returns these people (if they ever existed in the first place) right back to where it found them.

Right back into the...... "Bermuda Triangle".......




_______________________________________

 Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264


Thursday, June 12, 2014

The "GINO" - (Galactica in Name Only) Troll Army (All 15 People From Universal Studios)) Are Still Sprinkled All Over The Internet Singing Its "Stealth Marketing" Praises


In honor of these idiots....let's review the reasons why this television series was a "Mass Market Commercial Flop" in every way...

1. "GINO" - (Galactica in Name Only) from day one was a "Career Killer." From Ronald D. Moore, to David Eick, to Edward James Olmos, to Katee Sackhoff....everyone associated with this production did not go on to bigger and better things after "GINO" was finally cancelled due to low ratings. Instead...some of them just "putzed" along to sporadic insignificant projects that didn't ignite careers either.

It's as though "GINO" had that "Poltergeist Movie Curse" thingy hanging over it from day one plaguing the cast and crew.

2. "GINO" - (Galactica in Name Only) aired on an insignificant cable network ravaged by bad management years before "GINO" premiered. A cable network (Bonnie Hammer's Sci-Fi Channel) all too accustomed to routine low ratings in everything she did. So of course when "GINO" came along it too was ravaged by bad management and inexplicable bad decision making from the producers (Ronald D. Moore, David Eick) and writers.

3. "GINO" - (Galactica in Name Only) was not "Battlestar Galactica." Instead, it was a television continuation of the "Blade Runner" movie from 1982 that no one in the public domain remembered except "Yours Truly." This "Blade Runner" movie (I might as well say it) was also a massive "Box Office Flop" big time in 1982. So big of a flop it was in fact, that no one in Hollywood ever entertained the notion of revisiting the movie until Edward James Olmos came along and said...."Hey, let's revisit 'Blade Runner' instead of doing a 'Battlestar Galactica' series." What rationally minded television network would have allowed this...."Commercial Flop"....nonsense to have occurred?" Bonnie Hammer's Sci-Fi Channel....that's what!! A badly produced and badly written television series based upon an...."Economic Disaster" (flop).....of a movie from 1982!! No wonder (among many other reasons) Ronald D. Moore is as much of an "unknown" behind the scenes producer  present day as he was a decade ago.

"GINO" was also Ronald D. Moore's...."Wet Dream"....of a television series as to what he thought...."Star Trek: Voyager"....should have been. "Dark & Gritty!!"......"Dark & Gritty!!"....."Dark & Gritty!!"

4. An unappealing leading man. Edward James Olmos was not an appealing leading man for a television project like this. When you're dealing with television, you are also dealing with the economic necessity of having to cast actors mass market audiences would find instantaneously attractive. This motivates mass market audiences to want to continue watching your show. Yes, "GINO" had a dark premise (the dark premise it ripped off from "Battlestar Galactica") in order to do "Blade Runner" for the small screen...but you still have to find a way to attract a mass market television audience despite that. This Olmos guy frowned constantly, was no fun to look at, giving mass market audiences no reason to stick around.

5. "GINO" was a mass market flop after its first season. What do you do with mass market flops in television? you cancel them!! Period!! What did Sci-Fi Channel do? Intensify the mass market unattractiveness of this show by allowing it to crawl along for three more low rated seasons. And its ratings continued to get lower and lower because of that.

6. "Status Awards" do not make a bad television show into a good television show. Just because Harlan Ellison may have liked this stupid show and gave the show some stupid award because of that....doesn't mean "squat" in the television industry. You either have the numbers or you don't. You either have the vast majority of the mass market audience or you don't. "GINO" didn't have anything going for it. It didn't have the numbers and it didn't have the audience....Period.

7. "GINO" was the laziest television series ever made in the category of what was supposed to be "Science Fiction / Fantasy." It claimed to be taking place in a galaxy thousands of light years from Earth yet instead looked like good old Earth present day...complete with period piece automobiles, contemporary business suits, eyeglasses, and beautiful downtown Vancouver during location shooting.

8. Edward James Olmos shouldn't have done this series and I'll tell you why. If you have a problem doing what is supposed to be a...."Science Fiction".....television series populated with what are supposed to be "extraterrestrial creatures"....then don't do the damn show!! Either high tail your butt back to the theater or get yourself guest starring roles in "Bones" or "Castle." But don't stick around and have the nonsense written into your contract that you will immediately quit if there are "extraterrestrial creatures" in the show. Edward James Olmos proved himself to be...."Not a Science Fiction Guy"....in what was supposed to be a...."Science Fiction Television Series." Ludicrous!! Absolutely ludicrous behind his attitude towards this project. Of course, no one else associated with this project gave a shit about it either.

_______________________________________

 Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264



Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Eavesdropping On One of The Primary "Audition Locations" of Universal Studios Supposed "Battlestar Galactica" Movie Announced On April 7th, 2014



http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/transcendence-writer-jack-paglen-to-pen-battlestar-galactica-reboot-plus-new-featurette-posters-for-ai-thriller-20140409

This blog was fortunate enough to gain access to and get a quick picture of a primary audition location of Universal Studios where the supposed "Battlestar Galactica" movie announced on April 7th, 2014 is supposed to be (presently) holding auditions for this supposed new movie.

As you can see (and as a surprise to no one) Universal Studios is not holding auditions of any kind for this supposed "Battlestar Galactica" movie just as there is no script presently being written.

Nothing to see here....Move on....Move on....

And there continues to be formal confirmation that no "Battlestar Galactica" movie is on Universal Studios release schedule for the next three years and beyond...

http://boxofficemojo.com/schedule/?view=distributor&id=universal.htm

_______________________________________

 Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...

http://languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read these books at another location where Universal Studios executives and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the Amazon book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books. I'll leave the other 150 global locations under wraps for now.


http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264