The SyFy Channel Continues to Celebrate Its Ratings Failures Past and Present

 

 http://www.syfy.com/syfywire/watch-battlestar-galactica-cast-reunited-to-reflect-on-series%E2%80%99-legacy

http://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/video/edward-james-olmos-gave-the-cast-of-battlestar-galactica-a-stirring-pep-talk-when-the-show-began-filming/vp-BBD2rrr

1. It was a ratings flop during all four of its low rated seasons.
2. Its pilot episode had the lowest audience test scores in history.
3. All the praise it received was from hired stealth marketers on the SyFy Channel payroll.
4. It had absolutely nothing to do with..."Battlestar Galactica"...the 1978 series.
5. Edward James Olmos stated he wanted this thing to be..."Blade Runner"...for television.

6.  The honest, non-stealth marketed reviews of this thing (that did manage to slip through) criticized it for among other things, having a total lack of curiosity about outer space and extra-terrestrials. As well as it's astonishing hostility towards the very source material it was stealing from. The..."1978 Battlestar Galactica"...series.

7. It was a strictly earth bound show on low budget soundstages in Vancouver, British Columbia.

8. Its supposedly praiseworthy script writing was instead, narcissism on the printed page at its worst.

9. These scripts would have made William Shatner blush.

10. Ronald D. Moore's..."GINO" - (Galactica in Name Only)...series was also misogynistic, narcissistic, pro-torture, and an ill-conceived television series without a discernible premise.

11. What is the very definition of..."failure"...within the television industry? No one within the entire sphere of television wants the..."GINO"...series in order to strip for syndication. They know that no money can be made from it.

 _____________________________


Read the books Universal Studios has tried and failed to censor on Amazon.com...
 
     http://www.languatron.freeforums.org/viewforum.php?f=60

And read the books at another location where Universal Studios and its stealth marketers won't be able to post negative, misleading (stealth marketed) reviews of the books via them purchasing candy and Rogaine Foam on Amazon.com (allowing them access to the book review section) and not actually buying and reading the books.

  

 http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/fullen1264

    I'll leave the other 215 retail locations under wraps for now.